It was a spring day on June 4th, 1960 when two young couples went camping at Lake Bodom close to the Finnish city of Espoo. Maila Irmeli Björklund and Anja Tuulikki Mäki who were both fifteen years old, were accompanied by their eighteen year old boyfriends Seppo Antero Boisman and Nils Wilhelm Gustafsson. Little did three of them know that a bloody death awaited all but one of them.
Very early on the morning of June 5th, a group of young boys, who had been bird-watching nearby, recall seeing a blonde man walking away from the collapsed tent in the teenagers’ campsite. It was not until 11:00 AM however, that a jogger by the name of Risto Sirén found the bodies and alerted police.
After the brutal attacks, the killer stole several personal items from the victims, including their wallets and multiple articles of clothing. Gustafsson’s shoes and some of the stolen clothing, were found about a half-mile from the crime scene. Several of the other personal items, along with the murder weapons were never found.
In the years since the crime the police have had many suspects, but three in particular still raise suspicion in the community. Karl Valdemar Gyllström known also by the nickname “kioskman”, a notoriously harsh man who ran a nearby kiosk and hated campers, even going so far as to throw rocks at passing children.
During a drunken conversation with a neighbor, Gyllström confessed to the Lake Bodom murders. However, the police did not further their investigation after questioning his wife, who claimed he had been asleep at home with her at the time of the killings. Gyllström had also been seen filling a well in his front yard only days after the murders. Many people believe this is where he might have hidden the murder weapons and other missing items, however the police search of his property did not uncover any incriminating evidence.
Although they never found anything, Karl Valdemar Gyllström still garners suspicion. In 1969, he drowned himself in Lake Bodom and later, upon her deathbed, his wife recanted his alibi. She claimed to have been afraid of him and that he had threatened to kill her if she told police that he had not actually been at home.
After Gyllström’s wife’s testimony took him off the official suspect list, the suspicion turner to another man, Hans Assmann. An alleged KGB spy and former Nazi (with an especially unfortunate name), Hans Assmann appeared on the police’s radar the morning of June 6, 1960, the day after the incident.
Assmann came into the Helsinki Surgical Hospital, fingernails black with dirt and his clothes covered in red stains. Hospital staff said that he was acting very nervous and aggressive and had even feigned unconsciousness. Other than a brief questioning, the police did not pursue Assmann any further, claiming that he too had a solid alibi. Because of this, they never took his stained clothing in for examination, despite the doctors’ insistence that it was blood.
Aside from his suspicious hospital visit, Assmann raised some other red flags in regards to the case. After seeing a news report about the murders, in which they released the young boys’ description of the man they saw leaving the crime scene, Assmann cut his long blonde hair (a characteristic that Nils Wilhelm Gustafson later corroborated about the killer while under hypnosis).
Dr. Jorma Palo, who had been one of the doctors to initially examine Assmann, went on to write three books about him and his connection to the murders. Former detective Matti Paloaro even went so far as to connect him with five other unsolved homicides. Many consider Assmann’s potential political connections as the reason for his dismissal.
Thanks to the multiple sources and literature alluding to his guilt, Assmann was the public’s favorite suspect up until 2004, when investigators decided to reopen the case after 44 years, claiming more advanced technology had uncovered new blood evidence found on a pair of shoes and the sudden testimony of a woman claiming to have been camping nearby. This new DNA analysis led to the arrest of a surprising suspect: lone survivor Nils Wilhelm Gustafsson.
According to the prosecution, a drunken Gustafsson killed his girlfriend Maila Irmeli Björklund in a fit of jealous rage. This was thought to explain the severity of her injuries and the fact that her body had been found outside the tent. They believed that he had gotten into a scuffle with the other boy and that was how he had sustained his facial injuries. He then killed the other two teens in an attempt to dispose of witnesses and inflicted his other remaining injuries on himself.
The new witness, who had only come forward a year prior for a documentary interview, claimed that the two teen boys had entered her tent and that Gustafsson had been behaving aggressively.
The Defense claimed that Gustafsson had no motive for the crimes and that the injuries he sustained were impossible to inflict upon himself. After being initially convicted, Gustafsson only served one year of his life sentence after a successful appeal granted him his freedom. Despite his acquittal, he too is still seen as guilty by man. During his trial when he was asked by a reporter how he knew he was innocent if he couldn’t remember anything, he simply replied “I’m innocent that’s that”.
With Gustafsson cleared of all charges and most other suspects dead, it seems as though the children of Bodom will never have their killer brought to justice. As this half a century long mystery marches on, it has settled into local legend. It has been the cautionary tale for multiple generations and will likely be told around campfires for many more to come, probably at the banks of the very lake that hosted its bloodshed.
source - screamfestla
Marlene at Miami Ghost Chronicles is a freelance writer and paranormal researcher.
Interesting stories about what is happening in the mysterious world of the paranormal. True stories, folklore, urban myths and interesting news stories that are a delight to the weird folk that enjoys the supernatural world.
We want you to feel at home when you post a comment on Stranger Than Fiction Stories. That’s why we reserve the right to delete comments and ban users as needed to keep the comment threads here civil and substantive. So read the guidelines below to make sure you are coloring inside the lines.
Do you have a story to tell?